USPTO serial 76319162
GANDALF
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- THOMPSON, LAVERNE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GANDALF?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott D. Minden
SCOTT D MINDEN HOWARD RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK &EMBARCADERO3 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 7SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4065Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | bakery goods | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 29, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 1, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Nov 17, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 18, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 19, 2003 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 8, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 8, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2002 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 19, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 27, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |