Drawing for EVENSTAR

USPTO serial 76319165

EVENSTAR

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAWRENCE, SUSAN KASTRINER
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVENSTAR?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Scott D. Minden

SCOTT D MINDEN HOWARD RICE, NEMEROVSKI, CANADY, FALK &EMBARCADERO3 EMBARCADERO CTR FL 7SAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4065

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028toy action figures and accessories therefor; toy figures; card games; equipment sold as a unit for playing card games; puzzles, except crossword puzzles; chess sets; role-playing games and accessories; action skill games; board games; equipment sold as a unit for playing board games; equipment sold as a unit for playing action type target games; equipment sold as unit for playing hand held electronic games; collectible toy figures; electronic toys, namely, electronic action toys; dolls and accessories therefor; collectible marbles and accessories; electronic and non-electronic plush toys; mechanical action toys; toy boxes; cases for action figures; hand held unit for playing electronic games; costume masks; puppets; role playing game equipment in the nature of game book manuals; soft sculpture toys; toy weapons, namely toy swords,knives, maces, axes, daggers, or bows and arrows; arcade games; electronic educational game machines for children; equipment sold as a unit for playing a memory game; fantasy character toys; LCD game machines; positionable toy figures; talking toys; toy watches; transforming robotic toys; and Christmas tree ornamentsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 20, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 20, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 14, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 10, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Aug 10, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Aug 10, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 18, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Feb 18, 2005EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Feb 1, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Feb 1, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 29, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 29, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 3, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 12, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 12, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 2, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 11, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 30, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Sep 3, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 13, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jul 10, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 10, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 18, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance