Drawing for "JUDGE FRANCO"

USPTO serial 76319288

"JUDGE FRANCO"

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FROMM, MARTHA L
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with "JUDGE FRANCO"?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Paul I. Menes

PAUL I MENES MENES LAW CORPORATION1801 CENTURY PARK E STE 1560LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-2317UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016MOUNTED AND UNMOUNTED PHOTOGRAPHS, GREETING CARDS AND NOTE CARDS, STATIONERY, ADHESIVE PAPER NOTE PADS, WRITING INSTRUMENTS, CALENDARS, DIARIES, ADDRESS BOOKS, BUMPER STICKERS, POSTERS, TRADING CARDS, WALL CALENDARS, BOOKS FEATURING FICTIONAL AND NONFICTIONAL INFORMATION ON THE FIELD OF LAW; PRINTED TEACHING MATERIALS FEATURING INFORMATION ON THE FIELD OF LAW; DECALS, CARICATURES, CARTOON PRINTS, CARTOON STRIPS, PAPER TABLE CLOTHS, CHILDREN'S BOOKS, CHILDREN'S GREETING CARDS, CHILDREN'S NOTE CARDS, COLORING BOOKS, GIFT WRAPPING PAPER, NOTEBOOKS, BOOK MARKS, PAPER PHOTO ALBUMS AND PAPER STAMP ALBUMSACTIVE—
025CLOTHING, NAMELY, BOOTS, HATS, BANDANAS, PANTS, JACKETS, SHIRTS, SHORTS, UNDERGARMENTS, COATS, SHOES, SCARVES, GLOVES, SLEEP WEAR, SOCKS, T-SHIRTS, TOPS, SWEATERS, VISORS AND VESTSACTIVE—
028ACTION FIGURES AND ACCESSORIES THEREFOR; BOARD GAMES, CARD GAMES, HAND HELD UNITS FOR PLAYING ELECTRONIC GAMES, STAND ALONE VIDEO GAME MACHINES, PLUSH TOYS, CHILDREN'S TOYS, NAMELY CONSTRUCTION TOYS, DOLLS AND SPORTS BALLSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 4, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 18, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 3, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
May 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 30, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 30, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 8, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 18, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 7, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 8, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 20, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 20, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 4, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jan 17, 20031.ADSEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED—
Jan 17, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 17, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 13, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 21, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance