USPTO serial 76319325
THE FORCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SPARROW, MARY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE FORCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Rosemary S. Tarlton
Rosemary S. Tarlton Morrison & Foerster LLP425 Market StreetSan Francisco, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Paper goods and printed matter, namely, address books, children's activity books, comic books, coloring books, notebooks, composition books, copy books, exercise books, guest books, picture books, children's books, books on science fiction, series of fiction books based on motion pictures and science fiction books, books on entertainment, books on movie-making, books containing puzzles and games, graphic novels, books containing screenplays, script books, books on geography, books on sociology, books on history, technical manuals relating to science fiction films, printed instructional manuals and strategy guides for toys and games, magazines in the field of entertainment and science fiction, journals, newsletters, and newspapers in the field of entertainment and science fiction, animation cells, blotters, blueprints, book covers, cardboard containers, catalogs in the field of entertainment and science fiction, coin albums, scrapbook albums, flashcards, comic magazines, children's books combined with toy and sold as a unit, trading cards and printed trivia cards, price guides in the field of entertainment and science fiction collectibles, stamp albums, photograph albums, stamp collector albums, coin collector albums, trading card collector albums, sticker collector albums, lithographic print collector albums, art reproduction collector albums, postcard collector albums, trading card collector albums, decorative rubber stamps, diaries, paper doorknob hangers, printed identity cards, printed invitations, lunch bags, non-magnetically coded paper transportation fare cards, wallet cards, writing pads, posters, book plates, book marks, checkbook holders and covers, bank checks, series of fiction books, juvenile books, reference books in the field of entertainment and science fiction and books featuring photographics | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 15, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 18, 2006 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 1, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 8, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 22, 2004 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Nov 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 29, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 9, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 24, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 11, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 21, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |