USPTO serial 76319563
VERITRACKS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VERITRACKS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SATELLITE TRACKING OF PEOPLE LLC
NASHVILLE, TN
Arlington, VA
Arlington, VA
VERIDIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
FAIRFAX, VA
Other trademarks owned by VERIDIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sharon H. Schick
ROGER P FUREY ESQ KMZ ROSENMAN1025 THOMAS JEFFERSON ST NW STE 700EEAST LOBBYWASHINGTON, DC 20007-5201Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | tracking, monitoring and locating motorized vehicles and cargo containers via a portable electronic device which receives and transmits location data from a GPS system or radio frequency system | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SATELLITE TRACKING OF PEOPLE LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Veridian Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Veridian Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by VERIDIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named VERITRACKS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 18, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 20, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 25, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| May 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 20, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 24, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 1, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 11, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |