USPTO serial 76319754
RITHRON
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COFIELD, JULIA
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RITHRON?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BIOTRONIK MeB- und Therapiegerate GmbH & Co. Ingenieurburo Berlin
Berlin 12359, DE
Other trademarks owned by BIOTRONIK MeB- und Therapiegerate GmbH & Co. Ingenieurburo Berlin
BIOTRONIK MeB- und Therapiegerate GmbH & Co. Ingenieurburo Berlin
Berlin 12359, DE
Other trademarks owned by BIOTRONIK MeB- und Therapiegerate GmbH & Co. Ingenieurburo Berlin
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jill T. Grant
JILL T GRANT HAHN LOESER & PARKS LLPONE GOJO PLZ STE 300AKRON, OH 44311-1076UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Surgical and medical equipment and electromedical devices and parts thereof, for electrical stimulation of tissue and nerves, namely external or implantable pacemakers, programming and inspection devices for pacemakers, defibrillators, cardioverters, electrodes; circulation support equipment, cardiological diagnostic equipment, catheters, in particular PTCA catheters, systems for implantation of stents, stents, equipment for balloon dilation, analytical equipment, namely apparatus for monitoring and display of physical or physiological patient data with respect to body functions represented by electrical or temperature valves, body movements or the like; patient monitoring equipment and medical measurement and control equipment; artificial organs, namely, artificial organs and limbs; artificial endoprotheses; surgical implants comprising artificial matter | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BIOTRONIK MeB- und Therapiegerate GmbH & Co. Ingenieurburo Berlin
- Other trademarks owned by BIOTRONIK MeB- und Therapiegerate GmbH & Co. Ingenieurburo Berlin
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Similar marks named RITHRON
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 13, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 16, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 21, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 26, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |