Drawing for AIRSAMPLER

USPTO serial 76319835

AIRSAMPLER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BORSUK, ESTHER
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with AIRSAMPLER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert B. G. Horowitz

Robert B. G. Horowitz Baker & Hostetler LLP45 Rockefeller PlazaNew York, NY 10111UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009computer software for recordingACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 19, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 19, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 29, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 29, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 30, 2004EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Dec 9, 2004EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Dec 9, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
May 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 13, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
May 13, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jan 21, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 12, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 10, 2003EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jul 7, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 24, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2002EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 11, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 19, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 27, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance