USPTO serial 76319845
SENIOR SURVIVAL GUIDE A PERSONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM MADE SIMPLE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SENIOR SURVIVAL GUIDE A PERSONAL INFORMATION SYSTEM MADE SIMPLE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lex A. Coleman
LEX A COLEMAN JOHNSON, MULROONY & COLEMAN, PC428 MCCALLIE AVECHATTANOOGA, TN 37402-2009UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | a personal information collection and recording guidebook/kit for senior citizens in the case of medical emergencies, debilitating illness or death; comprising a binder, refrigerator magnet, freezer storage bag, and heavy storage envelope | ACTIVE | Aug 20, 2001 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 29, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 24, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 4, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 31, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 29, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 11, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Aug 28, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2003 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PETL | COMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER | — |
| Jan 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 30, 2002 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 17, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |