Drawing for GIST

USPTO serial 76320066

GIST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PIGNATELLO, ELIZABETH
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GIST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Heather E. Balmat

PENNY SIMMONS-LENNOX ATTN: TRADEMARKS ADMINISTRATORTESTA HURWITZ & THIBEAULT LLP125 HIGH STBOSTON, MA 02215

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001chemicals and reagents used in scientific, laboratory and medical research in the fields of biology, systems biology, biochemistry, genomics, proteomics, metabolites, drug discovery and development, diagnostics, pharmacogenomics, agriculture, forensics, food sciences, informatics, and bioinformaticsACTIVE—
005Diagnostic reagents for in vitro and in vivo use in biochemistry, clinical chemistry and microbiology; medical diagnostic reagents for clinical or medical laboratory useACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 31, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 31, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 20, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Feb 4, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 4, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Sep 10, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Sep 10, 2003EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 27, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 31, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 11, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 29, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance