Drawing for SPECIALTY FOOD SHOP

USPTO serial 76320149

SPECIALTY FOOD SHOP

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GAYNOR, BARBARA ANNE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SPECIALTY FOOD SHOP?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michele P. Schwartz,

MICHELE P SCHWARTZ, HUGHES & LUCE1717 MAIN ST STE 2800DALLAS, TX 75201-4685UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Mail order retail services featuring food products and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 6, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Sep 2, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Sep 2, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Mar 11, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 28, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 20, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 13, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Oct 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 14, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Aug 7, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 26, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 5, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 5, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 28, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance