USPTO serial 76320169
Serial No. 76320169
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- LINCOSKI JR, JOHN T
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with Serial No. 76320169?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Vincent A. Sireci
VINCENT A SIRECI C/O TMSUMORGAN LEWIS & BOCKIUS LLP1111 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 037 | installation of satellite communication systems | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | providing satellite telecommunication services, namely, the electronic transmission of voice, data, facsimile, video and information; providing multiple-user access to a global computer information network, to broadcast programs via a global computer network | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | design services for others in the field of satellite communications systems | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Globecomm Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Globecomm Systems, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 038
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 10, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 10, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Nov 30, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 27, 2005 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 7, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 19, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 26, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 27, 2003 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 3, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 15, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | 1.BA | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | 1.AD | SEC. 1(A) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 10, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |