USPTO serial 76320452
CHARLOTTE LYNGGAARD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SHEFFIELD, SHARI
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with CHARLOTTE LYNGGAARD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Louis K. Ebling
LOUIS K EBLING TGREENEBAUM DOLL & MCDONALD PLLC2800 CHEMED CTR 255 E FIFTH STCINCINNATI, OH 45202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Precious metals and their alloys sold in bulk, precious metals, jewelry, namely, necklaces; chokers made with diamonds; pearls and beads; chains made of steel, silver, gold and/or precious stones; clasps and exchangeable clasps; bracelets, chain bracelets and armrings, namely bangles; charms for bracelets; fingerings; earring, earclips and ear ornaments; brooches and ornamental pins; pendants; tiaras; buckles; cufflinks; tie clips and pins; key rings; precious stones; clocks and watches; chronographs for use as watches; and chronometers | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 18, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 18, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 5, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 3, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 12, 2003 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 30, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 10, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 13, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 28, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Feb 13, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 3, 2002 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 8, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 1, 2002 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 1, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 28, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 2, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 22, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |