Drawing for ZURICH MERGER ARBITRAGE BENCHMARK SERIES

USPTO serial 76320554

ZURICH MERGER ARBITRAGE BENCHMARK SERIES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STOIDES, KATHERINE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZURICH MERGER ARBITRAGE BENCHMARK SERIES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Stephen C. Lee, Esq.

CLAUDIA CANTARELLA WILLKIE FARR & GALLAGHER787 SEVENTH AVENEW YORK, NY 10019-6099UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036Financial investment in the fields of capital, banking, debt markets, equity markets, alternative assets and hedge funds; investment adviceABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 6, 2003ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Oct 20, 2003ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION—
Sep 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2003TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2002ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 22, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 2, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 17, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 10, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Apr 22, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 17, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance