USPTO serial 76320678
SUPERMOMS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SUPERMOMS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
DAVID M PERRY
David P. Lhota Stearns Weaver Miller Weissler Alhadeff & Sitterso200 East Las Olas Blvd.Suite 2100Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | RETAIL STORE SERVICES IN PROMOTION OF A CONTINUING VARIETY SHOW FEATURING CLOTHING, JEWELRY, AND CONSUMER HOME PRODUCTS EXCLUDING CUPS AND DISHWARE | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT, NAMELY, A CONTINUING VARIETY SHOW DISTRIBUTED OVER TELEVISION, CABLE, SATELLITE, AUDIO AND VIDEO MEDIA | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 3, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 3, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 13, 2007 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2007 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 29, 2007 | INCE | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR EXTENSION REQUEST | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | LSOU | LATE FILED STATEMENT OF USE | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 3, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 3, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 5, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 1, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 6, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 20, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 27, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 29, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 8, 2002 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 31, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 28, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |