Drawing for "MINI V.A.C."

USPTO serial 76320734

"MINI V.A.C."

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MICHOS, JOHN E
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with "MINI V.A.C."?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Nadeem G. Bridi

NADEEM G BRIDI KINETIC CONCEPTS, INCP O BOX 659508SAN ANTONIO, TX 78265-9508UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010Medical devices consisting essentially of portable pump units and related tubing; all for use with wound dressings and drainage receptacles for promoting wound healingACTIVEDec 20, 1997

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 26, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 24, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Oct 24, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 28, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 18, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Mar 26, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 26, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 26, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 17, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Mar 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 6, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 6, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 10, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 19, 2001UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance