USPTO serial 76320788
SERVICEABILITY-LITE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3195394Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jan 9, 2007
- Examiner
- FAINT, MARY CATHERINE
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SERVICEABILITY-LITE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Serviceability Tools & Methods, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Serviceability Tools & Methods, Inc.
Serviceability Tools & Methods, Inc.
Ottawa, Ontario, CA
Other trademarks owned by Serviceability Tools & Methods, Inc.
OTTAWA, ONTARIO K1R 7X6, CA
OTTAWA, ONTARIO K1R 7X6, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd Braverman
TODD BRAVERMAN BRYAN CAVE LLP1290 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10104UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Facilities planning, namely, assisting clients, organizations and individuals in planning the location, use, allocation, management, disposition and configuration of office, commercial, governmental, municipal, institutional and residential facilities; Consulting services, namely, assisting clients, organizations and individuals in making decisions about location, suitability, functionality, quality, value and configuration of the facility they occupy, own, buy, lease, use or select | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Serviceability Tools & Methods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Serviceability Tools & Methods, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by TEAG-GEMH, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by TEAG-GEMH, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named SERVICEABILITY-LITE
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jan 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 3, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 8, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 16, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 27, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 14, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 13, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 7, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 17, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |