USPTO serial 76320914
STRINGS.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with STRINGS.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maren Coburn, Esq.
MAREN COBURN ESQ MORGAN AND FINNEGAN345 PARK AVE FL 22NEW YORK, NY 10154-0053UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | COMPUTER CONSULTING SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING SERVICES IN THE FIELDS OF PRODUCTION AND DELIVERY OF SOFTWARE, DYNAMIC APPLICATION SYNTHESIS, DISTRIBUTED NETWORKING, MULTIMEDIA ROUTING AND LINKING COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLIANCES; PROVIDING SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT KITS AND TOOLS COMPRISED OF DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE, ON-LINE PUBLICATIONS, NAMELY, TECHNICAL PAPERS, BOOKLETS AND BROCHURES, AND DOWNLOADABLE SOFTWARE FOR USE BY OTHERS TO DEVELOP SOFTWARE APPLICATIONS, REGISTRATION PROCEDURES AND INFORMATION IN THE FIELDS OF DYNAMIC APPLICATION SYNTHESIS, DISTRIBUTED NETWORKING, MULTIMEDIA ROUTING AND LINKING COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND APPLIANCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 18, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |