USPTO serial 76320920
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edward F. Perlman, Esq.
EDWARD F PERLMAN ESQ WOLF, GREENFIELD & SACKS PC600 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02210-2211UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Commercial clearing houses in the nature of on-line databases for literary, screen and TV treatments, short stories, animation, novels, screen and TV plays, dramas and songs and musical plays and compositions which are available for license or sale; marketing, promoting and advertising, literary, screen and TV treatments, short stories, novels, screen and TV plays, animated characters, series, plays, dramas, songs and musical plays and compositions and behalf of creators; literary agency services; on-line directory information services for writers, playwrights, movie producers, animators and other creators of dramatic musical and literary materials | ABANDONED | — |
| 036 | Brokerage of literary, screen and TV treatment, short stories, animation, novels, screen and TV plays, plays, dramas and songs and musical plays and compositions | ABANDONED | — |
| 041 | On-line media news service for creators for all media including plays, musicals and movie and TV production | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 1, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 15, 2004 | CRTP | REG. CANCELLED - RESTORED TO PENDENCY | — |
| Jun 15, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Apr 26, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 29, 2004 | 1.BD | Sec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 3, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 3, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 14, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 22, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 23, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 19, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 17, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 11, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 13, 2001 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |