USPTO serial 76320989
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
A-2483 Ebreichsdorf, AT
A-2483 Ebreichsdorf, AT
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Laurence A. Greenberg,
KARL HORMANN LAW OFFICES OF KARL HORMANNPO BOX 381516CAMBRIDGE, MA 02238-1516UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | High quality audio speakers; compact audio speakers; wall mountable audio speakers; floor mountable audio speakers; audio speakers with a wood housing; audio speakers with an aluminum housing; cabinets for audio speakers and loudspeakers; subwoofers; active subwoofers in the nature of bass speakers with a built in amplifiers; active loudspeakers with built in amplifiers; and electronic entertainment equipment, namely, amplifiers, tuners, CD players, DVD players, and surround sound decoders | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 2, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 2, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 19, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 10, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 9, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 17, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 4, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | IURF | IU INFORMAL RESPONSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 24, 2003 | IUFF | USE AFFIDAVIT FAILED FORMALITIES | — |
| Sep 10, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 26, 2003 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 22, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 14, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 24, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 19, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |