Drawing for DISTANCE ENGINEERING

USPTO serial 76321053

DISTANCE ENGINEERING

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GEARIN, AMY
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DISTANCE ENGINEERING?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

William L. Androlia

WILLIAM L ANDROLIA KODA & ANDROLIA2029 CENTURY PARK STE 1430LOS ANGELES, CA 90067-3024UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed matter, namely catalogues, magazines, books, newspapers, pamphlets, periodicals, brochures, newsletters and journals, all in the fields of telecommunications, employment in the field of engineering and computers; calendars, postcards, decals, posters, stickers and bumper stickersABANDONED—
038Cellular telephone communication services, teletypewriter communication services, communication by computer terminals, namely electronic transmission of data, messages, and documents via a computer terminals; communication by telegrams; communication by telephone, facsimile communication, wireless paging servicesABANDONED—
042computer software design for others; computer programming for others; maintenance of computer softwareABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 25, 2004MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 26, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 26, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 26, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 26, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 27, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2004OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 13, 2004OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Dec 16, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 26, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 15, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 14, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Oct 7, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
May 13, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 13, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
May 9, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Apr 14, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 3, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 3, 2003CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Mar 27, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 24, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jan 6, 20031.BDSec. 1(B) CLAIM DELETED—
Dec 4, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 12, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 12, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 12, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 16, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 16, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance