Drawing for CRYSTAL FINE

USPTO serial 76321103

CRYSTAL FINE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRACEY, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CRYSTAL FINE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jill Anderfuren

JILL ANDERFUREN MARSHALL, GERSTEIN & BORUNSEARS TWR233 S WACKER DRCHICAGO, IL 60606-6306

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Electronic display panels, liquid crystal displays, light emitting diode displays; computers, computer printers, image scanners; computer software for processing digital images, computer software for controlling the operation of computer printer, digital cameras, batteries and battery chargers for digital cameras; word processors, facsimile machines, electrostatic copy machines, cellular phones, projectors for slides, movies, photographs or television programs, digital projectors for projecting computer data on a screen, PDA, namely, personal digital assistants; audio visual apparatus and apparatus for recording, transmitting or reproducing sound or images, namely, video cassette recorders, audio tape recorders, video tape recorders, video disc players; television sets, television sets, television cameras, video cameras; parts of all the aforesaid goodsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 9, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 9, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Sep 29, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 29, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 2, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Apr 4, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 4, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 13, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 23, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 20, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Feb 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 10, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 3, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 13, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 11, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Aug 6, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 7, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 19, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance