USPTO serial 76321218
DIVA TEENZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RICHARDS, LESLIE
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with DIVA TEENZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
CHRISTOPHER J BISCHOFF
CHRISTOPHER J BISCHOFF BISCHOFF & ASSOCIATES LTD1731 CENTRAL STEVANSTON, IL 60201UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | dolls, doll clothing, doll accessories, action figures and action figure accessories | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 29, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 25, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 31, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 17, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |