USPTO serial 76321283
OCENA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FOSTER, STEVEN
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with OCENA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
TORONTO, ONTARIO, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MELANIE J. NEUMANN
MELANIE J NEUMANN FREDRIKSON & BYRON, PA900 SECOND AVE S STE 1100MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Stationery namely, calendars, greeting cards, photograph and storage albums, greeting cards; pamphlets, journals, brochures, newsletters, periodicals, magazines, printed reviews, books, catalogues, and forms, all in the field of business and computer network consulting; portfolios, posters, appointment books, almanacs, atlases, photographs, paper banners, pens, pencils, markers | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Enterprise management systems services namely, consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation, use, hosting, monitoring, and management of computer networks for others; installation of computer software; hosting of computer networks and applications for others; remote management of computer networks for others; monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 17, 2007 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 26, 2007 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 24, 2004 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 19, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | 44EA | SEC. 44(E) CLAIM ADDED | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 18, 2002 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 10, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |