Drawing for DIVINE DIVAZ

USPTO serial 76321330

DIVINE DIVAZ

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
RICHARDS, LESLIE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with DIVINE DIVAZ?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

CHRISTOPHER J BISCHOFF

CHRISTOPHER J BISCHOFF BISCHOFF & ASSOCIATES, LTD1731 CENTRAL STEVANSTON, IL 60201-1507UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028dolls, doll clothing, doll accessories, action figures, and action figures accessoriesABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 18, 2004ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Mar 18, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 18, 2004OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Mar 18, 2004OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Jan 12, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2003OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 25, 2003OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 4, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 15, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 6, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 6, 2002IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Dec 4, 2002AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Dec 3, 2002ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 17, 2002IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Oct 1, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 7, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jul 17, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 14, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance