USPTO serial 76321460
VIP BETA CLUB
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FROMM, MARTHA L
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with VIP BETA CLUB?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE
WILLIAM F LAWRENCE FROMMER LAWRENCE & HAUG LLP745 5TH AVENEW YORK, NY 10151UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by BAYER SCHERING PHARMA AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT
- Other trademarks owned by Schering Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks owned by Schering Aktiengesellschaft
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named VIP BETA CLUB
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 19, 2008 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2008 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| May 18, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 4, 2008 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 30, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 7, 2007 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 6, 2007 | CNES | SU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 11, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 19, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | CNCF | SU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Dec 7, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 20, 2006 | MREI | NOTICE OF REINSTATEMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 18, 2006 | RGTT | REINSTATEMENT GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 27, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 24, 2006 | CNFR | SU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 15, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 12, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 24, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| May 20, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 7, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 8, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Nov 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 21, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 8, 2003 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2003 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 20, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 31, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 11, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |