USPTO serial 76321536
FOLCO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FOLCO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Southampton, Hampshire SO16 7NS, GB
Southampton, Hampshire SO16 7NS, GB
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Royal W. Craig
ROYAL W CRAIG LAW OFFICE OF ROYAL W CRAIG, PC10 N CALVERT STSTE 153BALTIMORE, MD 21202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | METAL TUBES AND METAL TUBING; METAL TUBE CLAMPS; METAL TUBING COUPLERS AND CONNECTORS; METAL VALVES; ARTICLES OF METAL FOR USE IN OIL AND GAS WELLS, NAMELY, MANDRELS, COUPLINGS, SELF-MATING COUPLINGS, PRODUCTION LINERS, LINER HANGERS, CASINGS, SEAL ASSEMBLIES, AND A SELF-MATING COUPLING THAT HYDRAULICALLY CONNECTS A METAL CONDUIT ATTACHED TO A FIXED CASING TO A METAL CONDUIT ATTACHED TO A DEPLOYED LINER | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | OPTICAL FIBRES AND OPTICAL FIBER CABLES; STRUCTURAL PARTS FOR OPTICAL FIBERS, NAMELY, TUBES AND CASINGS FOR OPTICAL FIBERS; INSTRUMENTS FOR USE IN OIL AND GAS WELLS, NAMELY, OPTICAL SENSORS AND ELECTRICAL AND OPTICAL CONTROLLERS; OPTICAL TERMINATION BOXES FOR OPTICAL FIBERS; OPTICAL CONNECTORS FOR OPTICAL FIBERS; OPTO-ELECTRONIC TEMPERATURE AND PRESSURE TRANSDUCERS; PHOTODETECTORS FOR DETECTING REFLECTED OR EMITTED LIGHT VIA A FIBER OPTIC CABLE; LASERS FOR PROVIDING LIGHT INTO FIBER OPTIC CABLES; LIGHT EMITTING DIODES; COMPUTERS AND SOFTWARE FOR USE IN OIL AND GAS WELL INSTRUMENTATION AND DATA LOGGING | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 4, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 7, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | 44DD | SEC. 44(D) CLAIM DELETED | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 6, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 6, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2003 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 25, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 21, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |