USPTO serial 76321556
SUNTEK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUNTEK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Morton J. Rosenberg
MORTON J ROSENBERG ROSENBERG, KLEIN & LEE3458 ELLICOTT CTR DR STE 101ELLICOTT CITY, MD 21043-4178UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | CHIPS, NAMELY, COMPUTER, SEMICONDUCTOR AND SILICON CHIPS; NEGATIVE MASKS FOR MANUFACTURING COMPUTER, SEMICONDUCTOR, SILICON CHIPS AND PCB's; PHOTOMASKS FOR MANUFACTURING COMPUTER, SEMICONDUCTOR AND SILICON CHIPS AND PCB's; COMPUTER NETWORK CARDS; CIRCUIT BOARDS; SEMICONDUCTORS; COMPUTER INTERFACE CARDS; MICROCIRCUITS FOR MANUFACTURING COMPUTER, SEMICONDUCTOR AND SILICON CHIPS; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS; COPPER-CLAD LAMINATED LAYERS FOR PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARDS; SOCKETS FOR INSTALLING INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; SOUND CARDS; COMPUTER VIDEO CARDS; COMPUTER MODEM CARDS; AND COMPUTER MOTHERBOARDS | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2004 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2004 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 11, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 19, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 4, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 4, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 20, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |