USPTO serial 76321689
BEST SCENTS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
- Law office
- DIVISIONAL UNIT
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with BEST SCENTS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Riverside, CT
Riverside, CT
STANARDSVILLE, VA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Stephen P. McNamara
STEPHEN P MCNAMARAST ONGE STEWARD JOHNSTON986 BEDFORD ST STE 1STAMFORD, CT 06905-5621Goods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Leix, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Leix, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by BEST CANDLE, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Similar marks named BEST SCENTS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 10, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 10, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 5, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2003 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 31, 2003 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 18, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 6, 2002 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 14, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 24, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 16, 2002 | CNEA | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 15, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 8, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |