Drawing for FRA-CROSS

USPTO serial 76321742

FRA-CROSS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
WELLS, KELLEY L
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FRA-CROSS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Diane Donnelly

DIANE DONNELLY VON MALTITZ DERENBERG KUNIN ET AL60 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10165-0006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
036FINANCIAL SERVICES RELATING TO THE TRADING OF FORWARD RATE AGREEMENTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 28, 2004ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
May 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 14, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Oct 13, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 15, 2003UNPRUNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2003CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Sep 13, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 19, 2003CNSIINQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED—
Aug 26, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jun 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 8, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 30, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 14, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance