USPTO serial 76321910
CELLCRETE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BUSH, KAREN K
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CELLCRETE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel N. Daisak, Esq.
DANIEL N DAISAK ESQ TYCO PLASTICS & ADHESIVES1ST FL7 ROSZEL RDPRINCETON, NJ 08540Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Concrete/epoxy pipe coating material for underwater insulation of pipe for use in the gas and oil pipeline industries | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 9, 2004 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 26, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 22, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 25, 2003 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 28, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 5, 2002 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 16, 2002 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 9, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 10, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 10, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 11, 2001 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |