USPTO serial 76322000
THE INTERNET VERTICAL APPLICATIONS COMPANY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with THE INTERNET VERTICAL APPLICATIONS COMPANY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Westmount, Quebec, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Donald N. Huff
DONALD N HUFF DYKEMA GOSSETT PLLC1300 I ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20002-3335UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR USE IN DATA BASE MANAGEMENT PROGRAMS IN THE METAL INDUSTRY; INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF SOFTWARE FOR SALES QUOTATIONS AND ORDERS, PURCHASING, SHIPPING AND INVENTORY, CUSTOMER ACCOUNT AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, WAREHOUSE INVENTORY AND PRODUCTION ANALYSIS, INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT INTERCHANGE AND FAX OPERATIONS, AND CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT; INTERNET AND INTRANET SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF SOFTWARE FOR SALES QUOTATIONS AND ORDERS, PURCHASING, SHIPPING AND INVENTORY, CUSTOMER ACCOUNT AND FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT, WAREHOUSE INVENTORY AND PRODUCTION ANALYSIS, INTEGRATED ELECTRONIC DOCUMENT INTERCHANGE AND FAX OPERATIONS, AND CUSTOMER RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT FOR THE METAL INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | COMPUTERIZATION OF METAL COMPANIES, NAMELY, INTEGRATION OF COMPUTER SYSTEMS AND NETWORKS; COMPUTERIZATION OF METAL COMPANIES, NAMELY, CONSULTING IN THE FIELD OF DESIGN, SELECTION, IMPLEMENTATION AND USE OF COMPUTER HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF COMPUTER, COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION SYSTEMS FOR OTHERS; DESIGNING AND IMPLEMENTING WEB SITES FOR OTHERS; AND PRODUCT SUPPORT AND CONSULTING ALL IN THE METAL INDUSTRY | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 4, 2005 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 9, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 4, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 3, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 8, 2005 | UNDN | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 6, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 26, 2003 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 5, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 5, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 29, 2002 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 3, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 10, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 22, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |