Drawing for Serial No. 76322036

USPTO serial 76322036

Serial No. 76322036

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOHNSON, AISHA CLARKE
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with Serial No. 76322036?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven S. Payne

STEVEN S PAYNE LAW OFFICE OF STEVEN S PAYNE8027 ILIFF DRDUNN LORING, VA 22027-1210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Preparations for destroying vermin; fly paper; insect repellents; fly catching adhesives; insecticides for domestic use; insecticides for agricultural use; insecticides for commercial useACTIVE—
021Insect traps, fly swatters, mouse trapsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Sep 9, 2003EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jun 13, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Jun 13, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Feb 21, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 21, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Feb 13, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 3, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 30, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 5, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance