USPTO serial 76322378
BEAVERHOME.COM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MCBRIDE, THEODORE M
- Law office
- FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BEAVERHOME.COM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Niagara Falls, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Wallace F. Neyerlin
WALLACE F NEYERLIN726 DIVISION AVENIAGARA FALLS, NY 14305-2510UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | pre-finished hardwood flooring sold to end users; solid wood doors, interior wood trim and building materials, namely, decking boards | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | household furniture, namely sofas, loveseats, ottomans, and chairs; leather sofas; loveseats, ottomans and chairs, kitchen cabinets | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 15, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 30, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |