CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for GLADIUS

USPTO serial 76322507

GLADIUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
LAMOTHE, LESLEY
Law office
DIVISIONAL UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GLADIUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Carole F. Barrett

CAROLE F BARRETT HOWARD RICE NEMEROVSKI CANADY FALK ET ALTHREE EMBARCADERO CTR SEVENTH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94111-4065UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Pre-recorded audio and video tapes featuring science fiction games, films, and music; and pre-recorded CD-ROMs and DVDs featuring science fiction games, films, and musicACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 1, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 1, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 19, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 19, 2004DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Jan 21, 2004DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 28, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 21, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 11, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 30, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 23, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 30, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 10, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 31, 2001CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 27, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance