Drawing for METROPOLITAN FOOD & WINE FESTIVAL

USPTO serial 76322554

METROPOLITAN FOOD & WINE FESTIVAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with METROPOLITAN FOOD & WINE FESTIVAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert J. Eck

ROBERT J ECK LEGAL TRADEMARK DEPT800 WESTCHESTER AVERYE BROOK, NY 10573-1322UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING TRADE SHOWS IN THE FIELD OF FOOD, BEVERAGE AND COOKING EQUIPMENT, COOKING PRODUCT DEMONSTRATIONS, WINE PAIRINGS, CHEFS' SPECIALTIES AND SPECIAL BEVERAGESACTIVE—
041ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING FOOD AND WINE FESTIVALS FEATURING EDUCATIONAL COOKING DEMONSTRATION, WITH WINE PAIRINGS, CHEFS' SPECIALTIES AND SPECIAL BEVERAGES, ORGANIZING AND CONDUCTING BOOK SIGNINGS, COOKING SEMINARSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 17, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Feb 20, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jan 26, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 21, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Sep 10, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 22, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 21, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 29, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 9, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 16, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 10, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 11, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 11, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 14, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance