USPTO serial 76322713
TALON ZX
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AMOS, TANYA L
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with TALON ZX?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Middlebury, IN
Middlebury, IN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIC J. GROEN
ERIC J GROEN BAKER & DANIELS205 W JEFFERSON BLVD STE 250SOUTH BEND, IN 46601-1809UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 012 | Recreational Vehicles, Namely, Travel Trailers, Fifth Wheel Trailers, Fold-Down Trailers, Tent Campers, Campers, Motor Homes, Namely Class A and Class C Motor Homes | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 3, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 31, 2006 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2003 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 18, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 19, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 30, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 19, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 12, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 11, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 24, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 25, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 15, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 15, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 21, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |