Drawing for EVERYDAY FOOD

USPTO serial 76323209

EVERYDAY FOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERYDAY FOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard J. Shire, Esq.

HOWARD J SHIRE ESQ KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL STORE SERVICES, MAIL ORDER SERVICES, AND ONLINE CATALOG AND RETAIL SERVICES, ALL FEATURING FOOD PRODUCTSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 4, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 2, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Jul 11, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
Apr 23, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 21, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 4, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 4, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 31, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 14, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance