USPTO serial 76323230
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Lexington, KY
Lexington, KY
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Todd E. Stockwell
Todd E. Stockwell STOCKWELL & SMEDLEY, PSC861 CORPORATE DR STE 200LEXINGTON, KY 40503-5434UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | COMPUTER SERVICES, NAMELY, PROVIDING A COLLECTION OF ACCESSIBLE NEWS STORIES IN THE FIELD OF TECHNOLOGY, BUSINESS, AND COMPUTERS ON A WORLD WIDE COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Jan 17, 2002 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 27, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jul 2, 2010 | 8.OK | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED | The USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline. |
| Jun 30, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 29, 2010 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 20, 2004 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Apr 27, 2004 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 22, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Apr 9, 2004 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 15, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| May 7, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| May 5, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 9, 2003 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Apr 4, 2003 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Mar 25, 2003 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 13, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 12, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 13, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 2, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 3, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 27, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 12, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |