Drawing for EVERYDAY FOOD

USPTO serial 76323340

EVERYDAY FOOD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
OH, WON TEAK
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with EVERYDAY FOOD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Howard J. Shire

HOWARD J SHIRE KENYON & KENYON1 BROADWAYNEW YORK, NY 10004-1007UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029FOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY, JELLIES, JAMS, FRUIT SAUCES, EGGS, FROZEN ENTREES CONSISTING PRIMARILY OF MEAT, FISH, POULTRY OR VEGETABLES, SOUP MIXES, PRE-CUT VEGETABLE SALADS, OLIVE OIL, CANNED, COOKED OR OTHERWISE PROCESSED FRUITS AND VEGETABLESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
May 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
May 11, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Nov 6, 2003ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 6, 2003EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF—
May 27, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Feb 25, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Feb 21, 2003RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED—
Jan 23, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 23, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jan 21, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 9, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 10, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 13, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 13, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 7, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance