USPTO serial 76323349
BACARDI
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 2889610Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 28, 2004
- Examiner
- STRASER, RICHARD
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BACARDI?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janice Housey
Janice Housey Symbus Law GroupPO Box 11085McLean, VA 22102UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, [ dress shirts, sweatshirts, sport shirts, t-shirts, ] polo shirts, [ blouses, ] shorts, [ pants, trousers, sweat pants, jumpers, skirts, shirts, jackets, coats, wind resistant jackets, turtlenecks, sweaters, vests, ties, belts, suspenders, headbands, sweatbands, scarves, gloves, head wear, footwear, sportswear, athletic wear, and rainwear ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 1, 2015 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Feb 26, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 26, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 27, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 25, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 9, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 7, 2004 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 28, 2004 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jun 17, 2004 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 21, 2004 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 16, 2003 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 17, 2003 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 25, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 5, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 29, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2003 | REIN | REINSTATED | — |
| Sep 9, 2002 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 5, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |