USPTO serial 76323411
SUPER VALUE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CHOINIERE, MONIQUE
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SUPER VALUE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony F. Lo Cicero
ANTHONY F LO CICERO AMSTER ROTHSTEIN90 PARK AVE FL 21NEW YORK, NY 10016-1463UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 024 | Towels, oven mitts, pot holders, textile placemats, and fabric kitchen towels | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 9, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 11, 2004 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 3, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 23, 2003 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 22, 2003 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 3, 2003 | CNRU | DISAPPROVAL - AMENDMENT TO USE MAILED | — |
| Mar 2, 2003 | AAUD | AMENDMENT OF ALLEGED USE DISAPPROVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2002 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2002 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 16, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |