Drawing for PREMIER Q&A

USPTO serial 76323494

PREMIER Q&A

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
FILE REPOSITORY (FRANCONIA)

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with PREMIER Q&A?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David A. Einhorn, Esquire,

ARCH M AHERN AW-438MOTOROLA, INC600 N U S HWY 45LIBERTYVILLE, IL 60048

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer hardware and software, namely, computer software which prompts the operators or call takers in police, fire, emergency and other public safety communication centers to ask certain questions, the responses to those questions determining follow-up questions to be asked relating to a given incidentACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ABN6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 3, 2004ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 6, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 14, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 24, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 8, 2003CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 11, 2003CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jul 1, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2003TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 6, 2003CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2003ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 1, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 29, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 29, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 25, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 25, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 18, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 18, 2002TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 2, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 8, 2001CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance