Drawing for DOMINICK'S BAR AND RESTAURANT

USPTO serial 76323639

DOMINICK'S BAR AND RESTAURANT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOMINICK'S BAR AND RESTAURANT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-4011UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
033ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES NAMELY WINEACTIVEJun 22, 2001

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 2, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Sep 1, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Aug 31, 2004EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 6, 2004ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Aug 28, 2003CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 22, 2003JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Apr 22, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Apr 17, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 17, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 1, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 1, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 28, 2001CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 17, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance