USPTO serial 76323813
AGRISTAR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AXILBUND, MELVIN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with AGRISTAR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Steven J. Wadyka, Esq.
STEVEN J WADYKA ESQ GREENBERG TRAURIG1750 TYSONS BLVDMCLEAN, VA 22102-4208UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | telecommunication services, namely, transmission of information relating to agriculture and the agricultural industry by means of satellite, broadband and other forms of electronic transmission | ABANDONED | Jul 30, 1999 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 18, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Jul 8, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | ABN5 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 24, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 18, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 25, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Dec 26, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 5, 2002 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 7, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 3, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |