Drawing for INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE T. ROWE PRICE

USPTO serial 76324003

INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE T. ROWE PRICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE T. ROWE PRICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Andrew D. Price

ANDREW D PRICE VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1601UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in analysis, education, account access, and account management in the investment, investment brokerage, asset management and financial field; and computer software downloadable from the Internet for use in analysis, education, account access, and account management in the investment, investment brokerage, asset management and financial fieldACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 28, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 28, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 22, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Dec 2, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 2, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 25, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jun 9, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 1, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 3, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 3, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Dec 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 3, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 11, 2003PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 19, 2003NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 20, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 12, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 25, 2002CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Nov 22, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 7, 2002DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 22, 2002DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 22, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 10, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 29, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance