USPTO serial 76324004
INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VOGLER, ANN LINNEHAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with INVEST WITH CONFIDENCE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew D. Price
ANDREW D PRICE VENABLE LLP575 7TH ST NWWASHINGTON, DC 20004-1601UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use in analysis, education, account access, and account management in the investment, investment brokerage, asset management and financial field; and computer software downloadable from the Internet for use in analysis, education, account access, and account management in the investment, investment brokerage, asset management and financial field | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 23, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 24, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 21, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Mar 25, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 15, 2004 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 14, 2003 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 20, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 7, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 27, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 2, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 23, 2002 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 21, 2002 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 22, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 22, 2002 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 10, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |