Drawing for OLEOCEUTICAL

USPTO serial 76324145

OLEOCEUTICAL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
IM, JEAN H
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with OLEOCEUTICAL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mary E. Innis

MARY E INNIS LOEB & LOEB LLP321 N CLARK ST STE 2300CHICAGO, IL 60610UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Dietary and nutritional supplements; nutritional food additives for use in ingredients for dietary and nutritional supplementsACTIVE—
030Food additives for use in the manufacture of food products and for non-nutritional purposes for use as a flavoring, ingredient or fillerACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 19, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 23, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Oct 26, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 26, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 2, 2005EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Feb 14, 2005EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Feb 14, 2005EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 30, 2004EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Aug 19, 2004EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Aug 19, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 28, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Mar 16, 2004EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Feb 20, 2004EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Feb 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 29, 2003EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 6, 2003EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Aug 6, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 21, 2003EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Feb 13, 2003EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Feb 13, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2002NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
May 28, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 8, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 24, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 9, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 2, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Dec 13, 2001DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance