USPTO serial 76324221
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
SCHMIDT + CLEMENS GMBH + CO. KG
D-5253 Lindlar, DE
SCHMIDT + CLEMENS GMBH + CO. KG
D-5253 Lindlar, DE
SCHMIDT + CLEMENS GMBH + CO. KG
Lindlar, DE
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
KLAUS P. STOFFEL
KLAUS P. STOFFEL LUCAS & MERCANTI LLP30 Broad Street21st FloorNew York, NY 10004| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | HOT WORKING STEELS; COLD WORKING STEELS; STAINLESS MARTENSITIC STEELS; STAINLESS FERRITIC-AUSTENITIC DUPLEX STEELS; STAINLESS AUSTENITIC STEELS; NICKEL BASED ALLOYS FOR USE IN CASTING AND FOR USE IN FURTHER MANUFACTURING; COBALT BASED ALLOYS FOR USE IN CASTING AND FOR USE IN FURTHER MANUFACTURING; NON-MAGNETIZABLE STEELS; HIGH TEMPERATURE STRENGTH MARTENSITIC STEELS; HIGH TEMPERATURE STRENGTH AUSTENITIC STEELS; HEAT RESISTANT FERRITIC STEELS; HEAT RESISTANT AUSTENITIC STEELS; HIGH SPEED STEELS | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1981 |
| 040 | WORKING OF HOT WORKING STEELS, COLD WORKING STEELS, STAINLESS MARTENSITIC STEELS, STAINLESS FERRITIC-AUSTENITIC DUPLEX STEELS, STAINLESS AUSTENITIC STEELS, NICKEL BASED ALLOYS, COBALT BASED ALLOYS, NON-MAGNETIZABLE STEELS, HIGH TEMPERATURE STRENGTH MARTENSITIC STEELS, HIGH TEMPERATURE STRENGTH AUSTENITIC STEELS, HEAT RESISTANT FERRITIC STEELS, HEAT RESISTANT AUSTENITIC STEELS, HIGH SPEED STEELS TO THE ORDER AND SPECIFICATION OF OTHERS | ACTIVE | Dec 31, 1981 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2025 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 25, 2025 | RNL2 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (SECOND RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 25, 2025 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 25, 2025 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Oct 23, 2024 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 3, 2024 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2023 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 7, 2014 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Oct 7, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 25, 2014 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 3, 2012 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 9, 2010 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 5, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 4, 2010 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 5, 2004 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 9, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 6, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 23, 2004 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 21, 2004 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jul 8, 2004 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 20, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 28, 2003 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 8, 2003 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 2, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 22, 2003 | CFIT | CASE FILE IN TICRS | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 29, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 4, 2003 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2003 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2003 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 7, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 4, 2003 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 24, 2002 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 6, 2002 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 26, 2002 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 26, 2002 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 26, 2001 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 14, 2001 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |