Drawing for NATALDOC.COM

USPTO serial 76324268

NATALDOC.COM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GUSTASON, ANNE C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATALDOC.COM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Daniel I. Schloss

ALAN N SUTIN GREENBERG TRAURIG LLPMETLIFE BLDG200 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10166

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Prerecorded compact discs, laser discs, and floppy disks featuring information and course materials in the fields of neonatology, perinatology, gynecology, obstetrics, pediatrics, and bioethicsACTIVE—
016Printed publications, namely books, manuals, and course materials in the fields of neonatology, perinatology, gynecology, obstetrics, pediatrics, and bioethicsACTIVE—
041Providing courses of instruction in the fields of neonatology, perinatology, gynecology, obstetrics, pediatrics, and bioethicsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 21, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Mar 21, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 21, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 17, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 26, 2005EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 13, 2005EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jul 12, 2005EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2005TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jul 12, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jul 12, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jul 12, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 2, 2005DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jan 18, 2005DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jan 18, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 13, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 13, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 20, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 31, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 10, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 30, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jan 28, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Mar 20, 2003EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Mar 3, 2003EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Aug 23, 2002CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jul 8, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 8, 2002MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 3, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 3, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance