Drawing for STAGE DOOR CANTEEN

USPTO serial 76324636

STAGE DOOR CANTEEN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
DE JONGE, KATHLEEN
Law office
INTENT TO USE UNIT

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with STAGE DOOR CANTEEN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

M. Graham Coleman, 2d, ESQ.

M GRAHAM COLEMAN DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP1633 BROADWAY 27TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
041PROVIDING ENTERTAINMENT AND SUPPORT SERVICES TO US ARMED FORCES PERSONNEL AND VOLUNTEER RESCUE AND RELIEF WORKERS, NAMELY, PRODUCING LIVE AND RECORDED PERFORMANCES BY CELEBRITIES TO ENTERTAIN MILITARY PERSONNEL, VOLUNTEER RESCUE AND RELIEF WORKERS, AND THEIR FAMILIES AND PROVIDING RELATED RECREATIONAL FACILITIES AND SERVICES, NAMELY BOOKING AND PROVIDING FACILITIES FOR CONCERTS, PROVIDING DANCE HALLS, AND ARRANGING PERSONAL APPEARANCES BY MOVIE STARS, SPORTS CELEBRITIES AND OTHER PUBLIC FIGURESACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 7, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
May 12, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 12, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 23, 2004EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Jul 8, 2004CFITCASE FILE IN TICRS—
Jun 29, 2004EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jun 29, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 28, 2004EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 7, 2004EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 6, 2004EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jan 6, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 22, 2003NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 26, 2003DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jul 16, 2002PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 26, 2002NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Mar 21, 2002CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 19, 2002CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 28, 2002CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 16, 2002CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 4, 2002DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance